Daniil Sarksian vs Anton Chekhov Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
Wojtek Kolan
Published on 17 Jul at 09:36 AM UTC
HEAD TO HEAD
D. Sarksian vs A. Chekhov

RUS
1
Win
Played
0
Win

RUS
1
Win
Played
0
Win
Head-to-head: Sarksian 1 - 0 Chekhov
They have played 3 sets in total, with Daniil Sarksian winning 2 and Anton Chekhov winning 1. The last match between Daniil Sarksian and Anton Chekhov was at the M15 Hillcrest, 17-07-2025, Round: R2, Surface: Hard, with Daniil Sarksian getting the victory 6-7(4) 6-3 6-1.
| Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Sarksian | 1 |
| Chekhov | 0 |
Last 1 H2H Matches:
(R2) M15 Hillcrest(07-17-25)
D. Sarksian vs A. Chekhov H2H Profile
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| $0 | Career Prize Money | $0 |
| 40.35% (23-34) | Career Total W/L | 44.86% (96-118) |
| 1 | Hard | 0 |
| 1 | Total H2H Matches | 0 |
| 0% (0-0) | YTD Win/Loss | 0% (0-0) |
D. Sarksian vs A. Chekhov Match Preview:
- How does second serve performance impact match outcomes? Over the past six months, Sarksian has won 42.43% of their points on second serve, slightly outperforming Chekhov who has secured 39.22%.
- When it comes to returning second serves, Chekhov holds the edge, capturing 50% of their opponents' second serve points compared to Sarksian's 47.34%.
- In terms of first serve returns, Sarksian leads with 31.47%, whereas Chekhov manages 25.57%.
- Does the ability to save breakpoints make a difference? Chekhov excels by saving 54.63% of breakpoints, outperforming Sarksian’s 46.92%.
- Over the past year, Chekhov exhibits a higher match win percentage at 65% (W/L 13/7) relative to Sarksian's 39.39% (W/L 13/20).
- Sarksian’s preferred surface is Clay, boasting a 50% win rate, while Chekhov performs best on Hard courts with a 50% win rate.
- Who faces tougher competition? Chekhov’s opponents have an average rank of 132.2, significantly superior to Sarksian’s average opposing rank of 534.82.
- In matches that proceed to a deciding set, Chekhov prevails 60% of the time, surpassing Sarksian’s 50% success rate.
- Regarding breakpoint conversion, Sarksian and Chekhov's recent performance is comparable, converting 38% and 36.36% respectively.
Editorial Prediction (July 17, 2025, UTC):
Sarksian and Chekhov face off with varying strengths that could influence the match outcome. Sarksian has the advantage in second serve performance and first serve return points, which hints at his ability to exploit Chekhov’s serve.
However, Chekhov's knack for saving breakpoints and winning higher percentages of deciding sets presents a strong competitive edge. His superior match win record over the past year and experience against higher-ranked opponents reflect a higher level of play.
Given these comparative advantages, Chekhov is likely to emerge victorious in this upcoming tennis match.
Daniil Sarksian vs Anton Chekhov Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
D. Sarksian vs A. Chekhov H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches Won | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 1 |
| 18 | Games Won | 11 |
| 2 | Total Double Faults | 11 |
| 2:47:1 | Average Match Time | 2:47:1 |
| 54% (59/109) | 1st Serve % | 51% (49/96) |
| 73% (43/59) | 1st Serve Win % | 61% (30/49) |
| 52% (26/50) | 2nd Serve Win % | 45% (21/47) |
| 60% (6/10) | Break Pts Won % | 20% (2/10) |
| 47% (45/96) | Return Points Win % | 37% (40/109) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best‑of‑3 Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 100% (1/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
Recent Performance Stats
D. Sarksian Recent Matches Played
A. Chekhov Recent Matches Played

D. Sarksian vs A. Chekhov Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 40.35% (23/34) | YTD Win/Loss | 44.86% (96/118) |
| 41.35% (55/78) | Sets Win/Loss | 46.46% (223/257) |
| 46.34% (601/696) | Games Win/Loss | 48.57% (2102/2226) |
| 37.21% (16/27) | Hard Win/Loss | 49.46% (46/47) |
| 50.00% (6/6) | Clay Win/Loss | 41.84% (41/57) |
| 50.00% (1/1) | Indoor Hard W/L | 39.13% (9/14) |
| 0.19 | Aces Per Game | 0.12 |
| 121 | Aces Total | 250 |
| 0.29 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.2 |
| 181 | Total Double Faults | 412 |
| 1:23:22 | Average Match Time | 1st Match |
| 461.93 | Average Opponent Rank | 335.98 |
| 58% (1846/3203) | 1st Serve % | 61% (3705/6108) |
| 65% (1204/1846) | 1st Serve Win % | 63% (2320/3705) |
| 45% (611/1357) | 2nd Serve Win % | 45% (1073/2403) |
| 42% (121/290) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 42% (264/628) |
| 39% (1236/3164) | Return Points Win % | 40% (2595/6429) |
| 0.00% (0/1) | Challenger W/L | 0.00% (0/16) |
| 41.07% (23/33) | Futures W/L | 48.48% (96/102) |
| 39% (22/56) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 45% (95/213) |
| 55% (11/20) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 41% (14/34) |
| 50% (10/20) | Deciding Set Win % | 40% (21/53) |
| 86% (21/18) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 80% (101/81) |
| 14% (21/3) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 20% (101/20) |
| 14% (36/5) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 13% (113/15) |